Measuring Inflammation

Remember those old childhood cartoons where a guy hits his thumb with a hammer?  The thumb turns bright red, swells to three times its normal size, and hurts so much that painful rays emanate for all to see.

I remember the day I awoke in excruciating pain, my entire hand red and throbbing as if it was a model for one of those old hammer-to-thumb cartoonists.  In the cartoons, it’s funny – not so much in real life.

There have also been times my hands swelled to a lesser extent – not enough for anyone else to notice, but enough that it cut off the circulation in my ring finger.  When fingers swell so much that a perfectly sized wedding ring cuts off circulation and the finger turns blue, it’s a safe bet that there’s a fair amount of inflammation going on.

One would think that a doctor could write “significant swelling” as documentation of such events, but doctors seem to have a preference for numbers to quantify everything, including inflammation.  ESR (erythrocyte sedimentation rate) and CRP (C-Reactive Protein) are two lab tests that can be done to “measure” inflammation.  Unfortunately, those tests aren’t perfect.  People can have significant inflammation but perfectly “normal” lab results.  How ironic that someone’s feet can be too swollen to fit into shoes, hands can be too swollen to do anything, and a doctor can say, “I’m sorry, but according to your lab work, there is no inflammation.”  Many RA patients have “normal” inflammatory markers – accompanied by enough disease activity that joints are destroyed.

I’ve wondered why, if pharmaceutical companies can develop drugs to inhibit TNF-α, nobody can come up with a test to measure TNF-α in the bloodstream.  Same with interleukin-6 and the other proteins that are thought to be associated with disease activity in RA.  If numbers are so important, there should be a way to measure those things.

Scientists have been working on it, and have a new test.  This test doesn’t diagnose RA, but gives the doctor an objective number to indicate how active the RA monster is.  Announced late last year, the Vectra Disease Activity Test measures twelve proteins, applies a convoluted formula (take the logarithm of 1+CRP, multiply by .36, add the square root of this, multiply by that…) and produces a single number to quantify disease activity.

Yay!  With luck, this will be a better test.  Questions remain, though.

Given the number of RA patients with normal CRP, I don’t understand why that information is used in the new test’s calculations.  The testing company’s website compares the results to DAS28. I’d rather see some comparisons that show Vectra DA to be superior to existing tests.  What I’d really like to see is data from hundreds of RA patients with obvious disease activity but normal ESR & CRP, and see that this new test returns a high number, regardless of the normal ESR/CRP.  Show us the data.

4 thoughts on “Measuring Inflammation

  1. I couldn’t agree more. I have swelling yet it’s not always easy for others to see. Maybe it’s because I am thin and small. I have normal crp and esr since being on mtx and a biologic(that doesn’t work), yet pain caused by inflammation. This is proven by taking 10mg of prednisone and it is gone! It sure would be great to have a test that really worked, regardless of crp and esr. Hope they keep working hard at it.

  2. What’s funny to me here is that I have an elevated ESR and CRP — more than 3x the top limit of normal when they’re at their lowest — and yet my rheumatologist will look at my incredibly painful hands and say there’s no visible inflammation. Which I find odd because he’ll say that even when my fingers are swollen enough that I can’t wear my rings. But no officially documented inflammation … except for those pesky ESR and CRP labs that are always abnormal. 🙂

    (Granted, I don’t have RA — they don’t know what I have except that it’s most likely something autoimmune.)

  3. The issue with measuring TNF and IL6 in the serum is that there are really TWO issues when you measure blood levels of anything:

    1) How accurate is the measurement?
    2) Does the measurement have clinical correlation

    With TNFa and IL6, the issue is really more of the latter. Both of those molecules are used in a variety of normal, physiologic processes and can be elevated for non-pathological reasons. For example, if you’re stressed out, your TNFa levels can rise dramatically, without there being any inflammation present. It’s the same reason that, even though we use the serotonin reuptake inhibitors for depression, we never measure serum seratonin because the natural level fluctuates so much that it makes it virtually impossible to measure a “high” or “low” normal level.

  4. It’s a puzzle. I have a Vectra DA score of 46 which is considered High, but my ESR is normal. My CRP has been elevated for years, but now is elevated enough to show an abnormal lab value. I’m hoping this test will prove to be a real tool to help aggressively treat us as early as possible. It’s the only hope we have.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s